|
|
||
 |
 |
 |
|
||
« Tax avoidance, D'Arcy and who to blame | Main | EXCLUSIVE: 100% of non-doms to leave »
In the ongoing row about the non-doms, and all of them threatening to leave, one small consolatory thought.
Is there any chance that Chelsea Football Club, that home of non-doms, whether on the pitch, in the stands or in the boardroom, will itself leave the country?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blogs-1.gos.vnu.net/mt-tb.cgi/84249
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Non-doms I'd like to see go.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 |
I gather that nominations are allowed! May I suggest Ron Sandler (Northern Rock) who only ears £54,000 per month net. Finding £30,000 from that will be difficult I'm sure. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ad3f3c84-e0e8-11dc-b0d7-0000779fd2ac.html
Posted by :Stuart Jones | February 22, 2008 10:52 AM
You certainly may suggest non-dom Ron. Perhaps we should start a petition on the Number 10 website - we request that the following non-doms leave...something like that.
Mike Truman on the Taxation blog doesn't agree with getting rid of Chelsea FC (and I guess it might be difficult to get rid of the whole club as a non-dom, more just most of their people). But I have another evil thought.
Does the club's proprietor own the club through a complex series of offshore structures? Could the structure be hit by the remittance rule changes?
We can only hope...
Posted by :Alex Hawkes | February 22, 2008 4:14 PM