Accountancy Age blog: Tax Hack with Alex Hawkes Accountancy Age blog: Tax Hack with Alex Hawkes A blog from Accountancy Age

« HMRC accounts a mine of information | Main | Ain't tax avoidance great? »

What to make of Varney transformation?

What to make of the departure of Sir David Varney from HM Revenue & Customs?

He has got a new job which many are describing as at least a sideways step - as an adviser to Gordon Brown on 'transformational government.' Now I don't know whether Whitehall people regard that as a terribly exciting new brief, but it sounds like a lot of hot air to me.

Getting closer to Gordon Brown might be an astute politicial move. Then again, it might be catastrophic if it all goes wrong for Gordon.

The question that keeps nagging is: why not just stay at HMRC? Not only does it present some of the most interesting moral challenges in government, you are also in charge of one of the nation's most powerful law enforcement agencies in Customs, and are responsible for one of, if not the most complex and difficult IT challenge in government.

Why go off and be an airy adviser to the Chancellor? I just can't fathom why you would do that.

There is a cynical explanation. Sir David was having real trouble with the job. His relationship with select committees was always tempestuous - he never got on with the MPs and seemed to lack the charm required to draw the sting.

Carousel fraud was marching ahead, primarily as a result of a misfiring strategy that he inherited, it has to be said. Tax credits had done him enormous damage, and he appeared to add little to the department, having lost control of the policy space to more junior colleagues.

Of all those things, I'd say his discomfort with MPs and his junior colleagues were most important - there are, after all, always negative stories about the tax collecting departments of the tax credits/carousel fraud kind.

As someone who was the pin-up for private sector talent in Whitehall, getting rid of him was a major headache for Gordon Brown. It would have been admitting defeat. So he has ended up with a non-job to make it look like he has been a success.

I don't think, as a matter of fact, that he has been a failure. The merger was carried off with no major hitches, an impressive achievement. He was always pretty much on top of his brief whatever the problems, and is clearly a highly intelligent individual.

But I can't help thinking there's more to his departure than meets the eye.

One thing that might be worth noting is that HMRC is now like no other department in Whitehall. Its minister, Dawn Primarolo, has outlived two permanent secretaries. Are there any other departments, I wonder, that can claim the same feat?

Comments

One can only assume Gordon Brown took a leaf out of Prof Bob Sutton's thinking about the Total Cost of Assholes

Alex

Hard to argue with this analysis. My suspiscion is that Varney is a 'very good operator'. The trouble is, and the evidence was clear on Panorama on Sunday, he's not a charismatic, televisual chairman - and that's what HMRC needs.

So who's in the money. Is the book open?

Richard

I wonder who might be in the frame...

Internal candidate is likely to be Dave Hartnett, though I don't suppose he'd be terribly happy to be named in connection with the job.

There are two other considerations I suppose. Do they go for another private sector type? Or for another figure who has done well in Whitehall?

Anyone got any suggestions for those sorts of people?

My thinking is that another private sector chief exec or chairman might be seen as making the same mistake, or even of getting too close to business. Hartnett might be the opposite, suggesting a third option of someone from another department would be the most likely one.

Post a comment


Useful links: About | Privacy policy | Terms & conditions | Top of the page
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2008
Incisive Media Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, is a company registered in the United Kingdom with company registration number 04038503